Bot Blocker Index

← Index

Netacea

full-suite · private

Marketing claims

No claim captured yet.

Claim archaeology — what has been marketed, and when

Monthly Wayback snapshots of the 2 pages listed below, read back to 2019. A number reaches this timeline only after the sentence around it was read and judged to be Netacea describing its own product. Those judgements were made by an AI model (claude-opus-5) and have not yet been checked by a person. Every one is published with the quote it was made from and the reason it was made, so you can check it against the archived page yourself. Numbers that turned out to be customer case studies, uptime SLAs or traffic-composition stats are listed further down — recorded, not published. Nothing is inferred between two dated snapshots.

Claim publishedRead, claim not thereNo readable evidence
False-positive rate
20192020202120222023202420252026
One cell per calendar month, from monthly Wayback snapshots of the pages listed below. A filled block is a month whose archived snapshot carried that number. A gap is a month where we read a page that has carried this claim and the claim was not on it. Hatching is a month we cannot speak for — no snapshot exists, the archiver was served a bot wall instead of the page, or the page that carries this claim was not among the ones archived that month. Values are never carried across a gap.
False-positive rate — every change, with its citation
PeriodMonthsWhat the archived page saidArchived
Jan 2019 – Mar 202127No false-positive rate claim in 20 months where we read a page that has carried it; 7 further months had no readable snapshot—
Apr 2021 – Jul 202140.0001%
…Ground-breaking detection engine identifies and categorises more bots than any other detection techniques with <0.0001% false positive rate. Automation backed by expertise Netacea’s Auto-Protection technology backed by…
first · last
Aug 2021 – Jun 2023230.001%
…Ground-breaking detection engine identifies and categorises more bots than any other detection techniques with <0.001% false positive rate. Automation backed by expertise Netacea’s Auto-Protection technology backed by…
first · last
Jul 2023 – Sep 20233Nothing readable that could carry this claim — absence cannot be asserted here—
Oct 2023 – Dec 202330.001%
…attacks in real-time and mitigates them instantly Hard to detect, difficult to bypass Ultra-low false positive rate (0.001%) Outdated Bot Detection Misses Attacks and Drains Resources Conventional anti bot solutions leave you with…
first · last
Jan 20241Nothing readable that could carry this claim — absence cannot be asserted here—
Feb 2024 – Sep 2025200.001%
…side updates Active attack detection, instant mitigation Invisible to attackers, tough to bypass Unmatched accuracy 0.001% false positive The Netacea Difference Netacea Proactively Detects and Deters Attackers Across Your Entire…
first · last
Oct 20251Nothing readable that could carry this claim — absence cannot be asserted here—
Nov 2025 – Dec 202520.001%
…invisible to attackers. Trusted defensive AI Hands-free detection proven to block bots 33x more effectively, with a 0.001% false positive rate. Specialist threat intelligence Visualize live attacks, integrate into SOC tools and get…
first · last
Jan 20261Nothing readable that could carry this claim — absence cannot be asserted here—
Feb 2026 – Mar 202620.001%
…invisible to attackers. Trusted defensive AI Hands-free detection proven to block bots 33x more effectively, with a 0.001% false positive rate. Specialist threat intelligence Visualize live attacks, integrate into SOC tools and get…
first · last
Apr 2026 – Aug 20265Nothing readable that could carry this claim — absence cannot be asserted here—

No publishable claim was found on these pages for: detection accuracy, coverage, decision latency. Numbers we found and held back are listed below.

Found on these pages, not published as a claim

Our extractor pulled these numbers out of the same snapshots. Each was held back: a number bound to a metric is not automatically the vendor claiming a capability, and treating it as one would score Netacea against something it never said.

NumberSeenWhat it actually isArchived
100%2019-01 – 2020-11
16 months
not a vendor claim a figure of speech - "100% focused" - rather than a metric; our extractor bound it to nearby bot-traffic wording
…Stuffing Card Cracking Web Scraping Ad Fraud Skewed Marketing Analytics Peak Traffic Spikes Here at Netacea we are 100% focused on preventing malicious bot traffic of all types. Have a look at our Cybersecurity Glossary for an…
link
Pages excavated
PageEraMonths probedMonths read
netacea.com/
2019-01 – 2026-08
current9274
netacea.com/platform/
2019-01 – 2026-08
current926

“Months read” counts snapshots we actually retrieved and searched.

Sanctioned test surfaces

SurfaceTypeTierBasis

A — vendor invites testing · B — our own deployment · C — passive observation

Our test results

No sanctioned runs recorded yet.

Cited external benchmarks

None cited yet.